Puckpedia's Levine reminds us that the financial risk isn’t too great, in his mind, for the team trading for Kane in this case. Of course, that’s a healthy commitment from one team for Kane. There’s no third team with their demands. That’s essentially $14 million for four more seasons, $3.5 million a year each for both San Jose and their potential trade partner.įor the Sharks, this might be attractive because it’s a more straightforward trade. The other team, who would also acquire Kane as a player, would retain the other 50 percent.
Sharks retain 50 percent, other team retains 50 percentĭon’t rule this out: San Jose Hockey Now’s sources suggest that teams do have interest in this scenario.Įssentially, the Sharks would retain half of Kane’s remaining contract, the maximum allowed by the CBA. It’ll probably be a really bad multi-year contract, probably close in terms to Kane’s remaining deal, coming back in this case. That’s not ideal, of course, but nobody wants Kane with his current contract without getting something, on top of Kane, in return. The catch?Īs Hart Levine of salary cap site Puckpedia suggested, they probably would have to take on another bad contract in return. It’s still possible, however, for the Sharks to part with the entirety of Kane’s contract. Kane has scored 48 goals over the last two shortened seasons, which leads the Sharks. With all that said, let’s look at how the Sharks can, realistically, part with Kane. The concern is committing that many years to a player with such a checkered past, and therefore, an uncertain future. Not every organization will overlook these red flags, but a number of them will. Right or wrong, teams will overlook a pending battery case in Buffalo, accusations of domestic violence by his estranged wife Anna Kane, a possible gambling problem, and multiple reported instances of the player breaking team rules or not getting along with his teammates.
Kane signed a seven-year, $49 million contract in May 2018 that still has this year and three more seasons left on it. It’s complicated because of the combination of Kane’s immense ability on the ice, his many off-the-ice issues, and his sizable contract.
There are many ways to do it, but none are easy. That’s what the Sharks are trying to solve right now. How do you trade a problem like Evander Kane? You can read more of his coverage on San Jose Hockey Now, listen to him on the San Jose Hockey Now Podcast, and follow him on Twitter at Sheng_Peng. Editor's note: Sheng Peng will be a regular contributor to NBC Sports California's Sharks coverage for the 2021-22 season.He said: “We're toying with having it take place in the world of first responders: EMTs, firemen and police. The franchise has been dormant since Final Destination 5 hit cinemas in 2011, but a potential reboot was mooted last year and Perry says it’s still in the works.
#FINAL DESTINATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 SERIES#
Read more: Greatest horror sequels of all timeĮach installment in the series has followed a group of characters who survive a deadly disaster when one of them has a premonition of the event, only for the survivors to be picked off by the unseen force of Death itself.
#FINAL DESTINATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 MOVIE#
Meanwhile, creator Jeffrey Reddick promised the return of the series won’t “feel like a cash-grab”.Ĭraig Perry, who has produced all five films in the franchise, told Digital Spy that viewers will never look at a revolving door the same way again if the current plans for the sixth movie come to fruition. The producer behind the Final Destination horror franchise has teased that the upcoming new movie in the series will be set “in the world of first responders”.
0 kommentar(er)
